March 12, 2013

More Metal Hip Implant Troubles for Beleaguered Johnson & Johnson



Despite the fact that Johnson & Johnson is a well-known name in most households, they are currently laboring under yet another hit to their once squeaky-clean image. While most of us associate J & J with such things as baby products, the company is in fact one of the foremost manufacturers of medical devices. The first sign of trouble occurred when the DePuy (a subsidiary of J & J) ASR metal-on-metal hip implant was recalled in 2010 amidst a flurry of reports that the device was defective and responsible for literally thousands of injuries to recipients of the device. At present, some estimate that as many as 10,000 lawsuits have been filed since the recall of the ASR, the first of which is currently being tried in California.

Recalls and Lawsuits Plague Johnson & Johnson
Another all-metal hip implant manufactured by DePuy, the Pinnacle, while not yet recalled has had its own share of problems, leaving J & J to deal with yet another round of litigation.   Very recently yet another Johnson and Johnson hip implant, the Adept, was recalled from the overseas market, reportedly due to the high rate of failure. As if all these recalls and lawsuits over J & J and DePuy’s line of all-metal hip implants were not enough, on February 22, 2013, Johnson & Johnson was notified that the Justice Department and United States Attorney’s Office were looking into potentially suspect practices related to the marketing of DePuy’s metal hip implants.

The First ASR Trial Ongoing
The first ASR trial concerns Loren Kransky, a retired male, who suffered extremely serious side effects from the ASR all-metal hip implant. Although attorneys for Johnson & Johnson are arguing that Kransky’s health issues were due to a history of smoking as well as other pre-existing conditions, Kransky claims he suffered heavy metal poisoning as a result of the all-metal DePuy hip implant. Strong evidence in the case lends credence to the claims by Kransky that DePuy placed the ASR on the market despite being aware of specific safety hazards related to the all-metal implant.

Johnson & Johnson’s Public Image Tarnished
With over two dozen products recalled by Johnson & Johnson in the past few years, Johnson & Johnson’s public image has suffered not to mention their bank account. At the time the ASR was recalled, DePuy claimed it was recalling the implant due to a failure rate of approximately 12%. Bloomberg reports those numbers as being as high as 40%. Although there is currently no database in the United States which tracks hip implants, it is believed that as many as 90,000 ASR hip devices were implanted and recalled.    

The Pinnacle hip implant, although still being marketed, has been buffeted with lawsuits as well from those who claim they were harmed by the implant, whether from metal poisoning or inflammation, tissue death and bone loss leading to total implant failure. When the all-metal hip implants first appeared, they were believed to last from 10-20 years—considerably longer than their ceramic and polyethylene counterparts. Research shows, however, that one in eight patients implanted with an ASR will require revision surgery within five years of their original implant.

Legal Implications for Johnson & Johnson
The Adept recall is unlikely to have the same level of financial impact on Johnson & Johnson as the ongoing lawsuits for the ASR which have already racked up over $900 million dollars in legal fees and settlement fees. It is estimated there are less than 10,000 Adept hip devices implanted in patients overseas, meaning the liability will be much less for J & J. Johnson & Johnson is expected to take a much tougher stance when dealing with Pinnacle lawsuits as compared to the ASR settlements. Even so, surgeons are hesitant to recommend a Pinnacle implant considering the number of patients claiming they were harmed by the device.  Despite the recalls and lawsuits, Johnson & Johnson remains the largest manufacturer in the health care industry. The outcome of the Kransky trial will likely be a predictor of how the future cases will go, so plaintiffs and their attorneys are following the trial with interest.